最新消息，昨日，Roger Ver的律师Daniel Kelman给徐明星及其律师等人发送了邮件。邮件中称，“我发现我所提出的问题在过去的几个星期一直被Star与Jack忽略”，“他们需要一位具有职业证照的律师，才能根据我的问题给予实质上的回复”。
发件人: Daniel Kelman
时间: 2015年6月1日(星期一) 上午11:10:17
Dear Mr. Li Ya Jun,
You have been very quiet during these discussions for someone who is supposed to be representing OKCoin in a public and contentious matter. I hope there is not a problem with your Google Translate and you are ready to answer some questions. My questions to Star, Jack and yourself this past week were ignored.
First, when were you retained by Star? Was it this past week or earlier? Date? Were you the original Li Ya Jun who corresponded with me when this matter began?
Star placed your photo on the OKCoin website after I pointed out to him that you were the only Li Ya Jun licensed to practice law in China. But Star has refused to answer when you were actually retained. I am asking you now because I think it is strange that Star would avoid answering the specific question I asked regarding the date of your employment and explain why you decided to abruptly change your career to become a bitcoin exchange specialist, forcing me to believe you are not the person I originally spoke with.
Second, now that OKCoin has released a video showing v7 was signed by both sides and passed around internally, are you willing to admit there was a binding agreement? If you do not agree that this video amounts to an admission that v7 was a binding agreement assented to by OKCoin, please explain why.
Third, are you willing to discuss a settlement? I asked Star and Jack several times this week and they did not respond, even when it concerned discussing a settlement based on v8 (which I suggested merely to put the matter behind us, v8 was clearly never signed by Roger).
I am genuinely interested in the basis of your legal opinion. In order for us to settle this matter it is important that the individuals with an understanding of the legal consequences have a frank discussion. This has not happened. I hope you will consider providing your client the counsel he needs and providing a substantive response to my questions.
发件人: Daniel Kelman
时间: 2015年6月1日(星期一) 下午 03:49
我们希望你愿意讨论如何进行和解的问题。显然，大众都已经看到了有关您违反双方V7和V8条款的新闻文章。显然，非律师的人也已经看到了这些新闻并知道OKCoin 不是一家公司。你对赵长鹏的指控是你们OKCoin的内部问题，和罗杰无关。如果OKCoin真的有一份伪造的合同，那么也是CEO徐明星的责任。为了有利于解决这次争议并进行和解谈判，我们愿意放下V7/ V8的争议，其实V8合同对我方来说是没有什么好处的。
Star and Jack,
Sorry I forgot to cc you on the prior email to Ya Jun and his law firm. I hope he or his firm will respond with something of substance, but I am not optimistic given his track record. I have forwarded that message to you and cc’d everyone again. Please note everything discussed here is for settlement purposes only and we are not making any binding concessions or admissions of fact.
I am still hopeful that you are willing to at least have a discussion regarding settlement. It is plain to everyone reading these news articles that you have breached the terms of both v7 and v8. It is plain to the non-lawyers reading these news articles that your OKCoin-is-not-a-company argument is not legitimate. Your allegations toward CZ reflect an internal issue at OKCoin and do not concern Roger. If there was a forged contract floating around OKCoin it is ultimately Star’s responsibility as CEO not to represent it as authentic. In the interest of putting this matter behind us and commencing settlement discussions we are willing to look past the v7/v8 controversy, even though it v8 is considerably less favorable for our side.
As mentioned in previous emails, we are amenable to using v8 as a starting point for settlement discussions (those discussions and this email are without prejudice). If you truly believed v8 was the version you agreed to, there should be no reason why you would not want to at least discuss honoring your obligations under it. I hope you appreciate the message your refusal here would send to any party considering entering an agreement with you in the future.
Alternatively, if settlement is not an option, are you willing to discuss submitting this matter to arbitration? Arbitration proceedings would not be made a public record, unlike a civil action.
Making a legitimate effort to resolve this is in the best interest of both parties and the industry—if not by settlement, then by mediation or arbitration. I hope you and Ya Jun will be willing to come back to the table and discuss in good faith so we can avoid further escalation.
时间：2015年6月1日(星期一) 下午 4:15
Dear Mr Jesus and Daniel,
We have strongly proved Changpeng forged the V8 contract. Roger slander me forged the contract and has promised if I prove the contract came from Changpeng , he will apologize .
If I was Jesus ,I will never lose my words.
Before Roger apologize publicly in coindesk,twitter and reddit, we will never talk about anything with you.
This is the last email for us before we get the apology.
remind you Roger’s words:
Changpeng PGP signed every single email he ever sent me from firstname.lastname@example.org
If the document came from him, provide us with the PGP proof!
None of us believe you, but I will gladly apologize and beg for your forgiveness if you can provide the proof that the document came from Changpeng.
If you want a fight then let’s at least discuss how to go about it. Do you have any preferences concerning binding arbitration?
稿源：巴比特资讯（ http://www.8btc.com/the-last-email ）